Dear Scientists. I am not one of you. Or rather, [and this is part of the problem], you will, mistakenly, not think of me as such. But I have some advice about how you need to go about rethinking what you do. That you should is self-evident. Take a look out any window and you will see that your failures are piling up. No flying cars. Teleporting. Free power. Or perpetual motion. And many things deteriorate and break down. Sometimes, I see mud. Not surprisingly, there is discontent everywhere. People are dying, even in this year of 2016. A few weeks ago, my kids were in bed with a cold. No-one predicted this, and there was no solution in sight. All this, yet your disciplines carry on. I say ‘disciplines’ advisedly, since from my perch I can see you scurrying about in your sub-specialisms, without my sense of the big picture. Sometimes I browse the internet for Science things and I see pages full of equations. I conclude from this that you are out of touch with reality, and your failings to improve it. I have my own theory of the universe, gleaned from introspection, and many years living in it. Soon you can purchase the book length version, or attend one of my lectures. If any of you are open-minded enough to invite me to talk to you, I will happily appear in your seminar programs. Of course my suggestions will not look like a conventional academic paper, because, my friends, that you would hope for this is exactly the problem! If you are not so open-minded, and I strongly suspect you are not, that will again prove that you have a problem. Perhaps if you spent less time deriving equations and more time studying the history of scientific thought and the sociology of science, we would not be in this predicament, and this earth would now be a land of milk and honey, so to speak. The other day, I took my large motorbike to be fixed, and I met a man who wielded spanners and chains and oil and, lo, problem solved, and I thought ‘If only we could make a scientist see this!’ There is a painting called ‘The Scream’ [obviously an art history reference will be lost on you, but persevere, it will be good for you] and this is a good metaphor for what you will be faced with if you do not heed this advice to start holding some conferences soon to Rethink Science.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Marry on Why it’s harder to build… Kester Pembroke on Team transitory vs team p… Nicoletta Batini on Team transitory vs team p… Simon Price on Should Mervyn recuse himself f… gardinerams on New piece in Prospect on vacci… -
Archives
- October 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- October 2020
- July 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
I assume this is a parody of some kind of another post?
Sarcasm: The Bridge of the Ages.
As an Eng Lit graduate I must say I enjoyed this immensely. Swiftian [you won’t understand that obviously but Jacob Rees Mogg will be able to explain it to you].
Brilliant!
Great post!