On loosening by yield curve talking and cutting rates

Since Mark Carney took over the Governorship of the Bank of England in July 2013, expectations of the first hike in rates from 0.5 have been pushed further and further back.

Accommodating this – with a few hiccoughs along the way – has been the MPC’s sole tool for easing monetary policy.  Carney inherited the collective view of MPC formed under Mervyn King that the practical floor to rates was 0.5%.  So loosening then meant either more QE – which Carney was clearly able to persuade other MPC members was undesirable, or ineffective, or both – or yield curve loosening.

In February 2015, however, the Bank of England made clear that it no longer considered the floor of 0.5% to be operative.  So at that point, it obtained a new option for easing, on top of yield curve talking.  Yet since then, policy has been eased without using this extra tool.

This isn’t obviously wrong.  It’s entirely possible that the best path for rates involved keeping them just where they were, but where adjustment was purely through the timing of the first hike.

But a clear starting point for thinking about how to change the plan for rates offered by models like the Bank’s own COMPASS would be that as conditions worsen, rates are lowered – relative to the old path – for a while, and then raised again subsequently.

This latest Inflation Report could have been the point to do just that.  The forecast under the market path the BoE used involved a small overshoot of the target.  But this doesn’t rule out a cut now, and a more marked tightening path later on.  I wonder:  have these trajectories been tried out in the Bank, but ruled out?

I wonder also if the reluctance not to use anything other than yield curve tightening is the worry that if rates were cut, without a device – like an interest rate forecast – to communicate clearly how the BoE would make up for it later, they would loosen monetary conditions too drastically, or at any rate inject more uncertainty into longer rates than they wanted.  Consequently, confining themselves to the broadest of verbal hints, the MPC are thus disproportionately reluctant to breach the 0.5% that has been the floor to rates since March 2009.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to On loosening by yield curve talking and cutting rates

  1. toby_n says:

    My understanding about the downgrade to UK growth forecast in the intermediate term was not things getting worse, but rather adjustments to the judgement about remaining slack in the labour market – informed by changes in behaviour around hours worked vs hours desired, leave taken etc.

    Furthermore, couldn’t the decision not to cut be understood along the lines of ‘we want to keep conditions as stimulative as they have been given that the challenges that we thought were ebbing now look set to remain with us’?

  2. Max says:

    What do you mean by “yield curve loosening”? I mean, obviously everything the bank does affects the yield curve, but at the same time affects asset prices, exchange rates, etc etc.

    I think the BoE has been pretty clear that the 0.5% floor was chosen to protect financial sector profits, not because rates can’t be pushed lower.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s