Unrevised inflation should put to bed the monetary and fiscal revisionism

The latest vintage of UK GDP released by the Office for National Statistics has revised up growth rates through the post crisis period significantly.  It’s caused some to speculate that this vindicates George Osborne’s ‘austerity’ policies, and others to wonder whether MPC voting might have been different.

But, note that the history of inflation, which we measure independently, and probably much more accurately, has not been revised.

Very roughly, given how the BoE views the world, this means that it will treat the revisions to GDP as pushing up both demand and supply in equal measure, leaving the output gap unchanged.

Why is that?  Well, simplify the monster that is COMPASS [the BoE’s model] a little to its basics, and you have the NK Phillips Curve, which says that inflation=inflation_t+1+something*gap+shock.  The inflation series are unchanged.  So something*gap+shock is unchanged.   Which means that unless the shock is revised in exactly the opposite direction, the gap is also unchanged.

You’ll be relieved to know that life for the policymakers is taken to be more complicated than that.  But this thought process will be at the root of what they do.

So there will be no great signal for monetary policy here.  And, likewise, there is no great signal for the efficacy of past fiscal policy.  Clearly there is news about the history of the natural rate of output.  News that should calm some of the soul-searching about why productivity dropped so much more in the UK than, say, the US.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Unrevised inflation should put to bed the monetary and fiscal revisionism

  1. Mary Jones says:

    Hmmm … aren’t CPI and RPI left unrevised because they’re not *allowed* to be revised? Contracts are written — and already paid out — against them. We know that the ONS was mismeasuring clothing for years, but the official indices don’t get changed.

    Figures for various deflators *are* adjusted, and those did change with this Blue Book.

  2. Tim Young says:

    I second Mary’s comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s